There’s a concept in sociology called the shadow economy: the productive work that exists alongside the official ledger, unrecognized by the institutions that claim to be tracking everything. It tends to be feminized. It tends to be invisible. I keep thinking about it every time the World Cup broadcast cuts from a match to a sideline shot of a woman in the stands, then cuts back to the field without ever mentioning that the woman in question just posted to 39 million followers.
That woman is probably Antonela Roccuzzo. Or Georgina Rodríguez. Or Tini Stoessel, or Tolami Benson, or Bruna Biancardi. And while the broadcast treats them as a cutaway, they are, at this specific tournament, running what might be the most efficient content operation in professional sports.
The WAG influencer economy at the World Cup is not a celebrity sideshow. It is a parallel media industry, with its own revenue streams, brand infrastructures, and audience reach, operating in the same venues and on the same schedule as the tournament itself, and almost entirely ignored by sports media, which covers it, when it covers it at all, in celebrity verticals, as if financial power becomes illegible the moment it moves through an Instagram grid.
Let’s start with the numbers, because they are genuinely staggering. Georgina Rodríguez, fiancée of Cristiano Ronaldo, star of her own Netflix docuseries and face of Chopard, L’Oréal, Charlotte Tilbury, and Calzedonia, earns an estimated $716,000 per sponsored post. That figure comes from the VANTIX/Lessie AI Pricing Matrix, and it is not a rounding error. She has 73.1 million Instagram followers. For context: the entire population of France is around 69 million. Our earlier look at both women covered their brand portfolios in detail, but the number bears repeating here because it doesn’t get easier to absorb with repetition. Seven hundred and sixteen thousand dollars. Per post.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DX92WoDCGpT/
Antonela Roccuzzo, Messi’s wife, childhood sweetheart, Anastasia Beverly Hills global ambassador since February 2026, Adidas partner, Alo Yoga collaborator, Louis Vuitton mainstay. She earns an estimated $391,000 per sponsored post. Thirty-nine-point-four million followers. Ahead of Argentina’s opener against Algeria this month, her leopard-print bikini post pulled 2.3 million likes in under 24 hours. Two-point-three million likes. While her husband was preparing for what may be his final World Cup.
https://x.com/TeamCRonaldo/status/2045784104587628856
I’m not sure the sports press understands what it’s looking at when it looks at this. The most generous reading is that sports journalism has a beat problem — there are soccer reporters and there are celebrity reporters, and the WAG influencer economy falls awkwardly between them, claimed by neither and therefore covered by neither with any analytical seriousness. The less generous reading is that the editorial hierarchy simply doesn’t register women’s commercial activity as worth the same attention as men’s athletic activity, even when the dollar figures are comparable. Both readings are probably true at the same time.
What makes the 2026 World Cup particularly interesting as a case study is scale. This is a 48-team tournament, the first of its kind, hosted across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, with the largest global audience in the event’s history. The WAG influencer machine scaled with it. Across the tournament’s roster of participating nations, the partners of major players collectively command a reach that most media companies would consider their primary business objective. Tini Stoessel, partner of Rodrigo De Paul, has 21.5 million followers and active deals with Under Armour and Adidas. Tolami Benson, Bukayo Saka’s partner and PR executive who has redefined what “WAG style” means for a generation of English football fans, is a L’Oréal Paris ambassador and River Island collaborator. Bruna Biancardi, partnered with Neymar, has built a YouTube channel alongside her Instagram following. Natalia Belloli, Raphinha’s partner, has 1.7 million followers and is growing. These are not people who attend tournaments. These are businesses that deploy to tournaments.
The term “WAG” itself is worth sitting with for a moment. It was coined by the British tabloid press in the early 2000s, originally a way of packaging and diminishing the women attached to England’s squad, reducing them to their relational status while covering them obsessively for their outfits and their drama. The joke, if there is one, is that the women who got labeled WAGs eventually absorbed the infrastructure the tabloids built around that attention and turned it into capital. Georgina didn’t get a Netflix series because she married a famous footballer. She got a Netflix series because she built a media persona coherent enough to sustain one. The tabloid machine created the audience. She monetized it.
Inés García’s sudden spotlight at this tournament is another version of the same story: a younger generation entering a system that is now, at minimum, semi-understood. The #wagaesthetic hashtag has over 1.7 million TikTok views. There are people who follow these accounts the way others follow match threads. There is an audience infrastructure here that predates this tournament and will outlast it.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DZrEpUyDUfn/
What bothers me, though I’m still working out whether “bothers” is even the right word, is the asymmetry of visibility. Industry analysts who track influencer pricing have estimated that average-tier WAG posts generate between $5,000 and $25,000 per sponsored placement. The top tier, as we’ve established, operates in the hundreds of thousands per post. This is not a trivial economy. It is, by any reasonable measure, a significant commercial sector attached to the most-watched sporting event on earth. And it gets covered, when it gets covered, as a lifestyle curiosity rather than a business story. The sports press, which will spend thousands of words on a player’s contract terms or a club’s transfer strategy, tends to treat the parallel revenue ecosystem running in the same stadiums as essentially decorative.
I don’t think this is a conspiracy. I think it is an institutional blind spot, which is a different thing and in some ways more durable. Institutions don’t have to intend to ignore something in order to do so systematically. The beat structure was built before this economy existed, and it hasn’t been rebuilt to account for it.
What Georgina Rodríguez and Antonela Roccuzzo have built, separately, through different strategies and different aesthetics, is genuinely impressive, and I find it slightly odd that sports culture either ignores them entirely or engages with them purely as extensions of their partners’ narratives. The $716,000-per-post figure is not Ronaldo’s achievement. It is hers. The Anastasia Beverly Hills global ambassador deal is not Messi’s deal. It is Antonela’s. These are autonomous commercial achievements that happen to exist in the orbit of famous men, which apparently makes them difficult for the sports press to see clearly.
The World Cup will end. The standings will be analyzed, the goals replayed, the breakout players profiled at length. And in the same weeks, Georgina will post from the stands, and the sponsored content will go out, and the numbers will be what they are — enormous, largely uncounted, running parallel to everything the official sports press considers worth covering. I’m not sure what the right institutional response to that is. I’m not sure there’s a sports editor alive who knows how to budget for it. But I think the gap between the scale of this economy and the attention it receives from people who claim to cover sports professionally is, itself, something worth naming — even if all I can do right now is point at it and sit with the discomfort of not knowing exactly what it means.
Explore more in our soccer coverage.
