Ryan Day looked at JPMorgan Chase’s blue logo on a mockup of an Ohio State jersey and killed it before anyone finished the pitch, and I cannot get over how much faster that reflex fired than any reflex this program has ever shown about compensating the human beings who actually wear that jersey. He didn’t ask for a study or convene a committee. He just said no.
That instinct is the whole story. It says plenty about how Ohio State ranks its priorities: the athletic department will move heaven and earth to protect its own aesthetic brand, then treat everything else stitched onto that uniform, who profits from it, who’s wearing it, who doesn’t see a dime, as a negotiable afterthought.
The deal itself is real money. Ohio State signed on as JPMorgan Chase’s first-ever jersey patch sponsor across all 36 of its varsity sports, a rollout made possible by the NCAA’s decision in January 2026 to finally allow patch sponsorships. The school hasn’t put an official number on it, but it’s reportedly worth more than $15 million a year. ESPN’s Pete Thamel has the figure closer to $17 million, though nobody at Ohio State will confirm either one. Boosters don’t write checks like that. Banks do.
And Chase isn’t some regional lender trying to buy goodwill in Columbus. Chase is the largest bank in the country, and it already has a real physical footprint in that city.
https://twitter.com/MoenAfterDark/status/2079983118329495875
Two million square feet of corporate real estate down the road from the Horseshoe, and the return on that investment is a few square inches of fabric on a few hundred kids’ shoulders. That’s the scale of institution Ryan Day was negotiating with when the first mockup landed on his desk in Chase blue.
Day’s reaction was immediate: “Absolutely not — we’re not doing this.” Chase’s blue happens to be Michigan’s blue too, and nobody who has coached this rivalry for a full season needs that explained twice.
The two sides negotiated from there, and the back-and-forth is where the leverage actually shows. Ross Bjork described it plainly: “We would say there can be an alternate color. We would say, ‘Let’s talk about a white color or, you know, a gray color or something like that.’” The athletic director of a major college football program is describing, in real time, exactly how much leverage that department has when its own visual identity is on the line. Nobody asked Chase to reconsider the deal. They asked Chase to reconsider the color, and Chase said fine.
Day signed off immediately once he saw the white version: “OK. It’s a whole different deal, because that was absolutely not going to happen.” A whole different deal, for a color swap. The actual terms of who profits from a jersey with a bank’s logo stitched to it, the players wearing it, the ones whose faces sell that logo on television every Saturday, were never on the table to begin with. Nobody had veto power over that arrangement, because nobody with that kind of power was ever asked to use it on their behalf.
Fans noticed something was off, even if most of them were looking at the wrong half of it. One critic summed up the reaction online: “Didn’t realize Ohio State was poor. Yikes. This is a bad look.” Wrong diagnosis, right instinct. The bad look isn’t a $15-million-a-year athletic department taking sponsor money. The bad look is that the only person in this entire arrangement with real veto power used it to protect a shade of gray.
Nobody’s shutting down college football’s cash grab, and nobody expects a bank’s marketing department to grow a conscience it was never built to have. But next time somebody tells you this program fights for the kids wearing that jersey, ask them to name one fight that moved as fast, or mattered as much to the building, as the bullshit fight over what color the patch was going to be.
